Referendum in May Vote YES – Remove all restrictions on Divorce

By Paul Murphy TD

“Hello Divorce – Bye Bye Daddy” was a key slogan of the right-wing No campaign seeking to prevent the introduction of divorce in Ireland in 1995. That referendum passed by the narrowest of margins, 0.5%.

It is an indication of the sweeping social change which has taken place, particularly the undermining of the Catholic church, that the new divorce referendum on May 24 is likely to see an overwhelming Yes vote.

The Constitution

If passed, this referendum would remove the restrictions in the Constitution on the availability of divorce, including the provision that the couple must be separated for four of the previous five years. Instead, the government plans to legislate for two years separation.

When originally introduced by Josepha Madigan, a Fine Gael TD, now Minister, as a ‘private members bill’, the proposal for two years of separation was to go into the Constitution itself. Solidarity and Socialist Party TDs argued in the Dáil that there should be no such restriction in the Constitution. Reflecting the change that has taken place, and the experience of the Repeal referendum, the government agreed to remove all restrictions from the Constitution and simply to legislate for it.

A civil right

We welcome the referendum and will be campaigning for a Yes vote. It is a civil right for those who wish to marry to be able to do so. The necessary corollary for that is that couples should be able to divorce as they wish. It is positive that there will be no restriction in the Constitution, however there should be no legal restrictions whatsoever.

These restrictions in practice will affect the most vulnerable. While in an amicable divorce, a couple could agree to say they were separated longer than they were, in other situations, an abusive former partner could dispute the separation time, and seek to block the divorce.

In order for this legal change to make a real difference for most people, it must be accompanied by economic and social changes which make the right to divorce genuinely accessible. Many women in particular are trapped in marriages, or relationships, that are abusive, or simply unhappy, because without their family home, or their joint income, them and their children could be made homeless.

Neoliberalism

It is illustrative of the neoliberal nature of Fine Gael, that at the same time that they are proposing liberalisation of divorce laws, they have implemented horrific cuts in refuge services for those fleeing domestic violence! Ireland now has less than a third of the number of spaces it should have according to European guidelines. Only 11 refuge unit spaces are available in Dublin City, and one in three counties across the country have no spaces whatsoever! Similarly, the costs of getting legal advice and representation can be prohibitive in the case of a disputed divorce.

To make the legal right to divorce accessible to all, all legal restrictions on it should be removed. This needs to be combined with the right to free legal advice and representation for all who need it. Inextricably linked to that is the right of people to housing – with proper rent controls and a massive programme of public home building, as well as adequate provision of refuge spaces.

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

FAI scandal: Sack the board & open the books

Next Article

Limerick Soviet 1919 “The Bottom Dog” Revolts

Related Posts
Read More

Austerity policies rejected in France and Greece

Speaking in the aftermath of the French election, which exit polls predict will see François Hollande defeat Nicholas Sarkozy and exit polls from Greece that indicate a punishment for the two traditional establishment parties of New Democracy and PASOK and strong votes for forces of the radical left, with the radical left coalition, Syriza, claiming second position, Paul Murphy MEP (Socialist Party / United Left Alliance) commented:

Read More

Euroepan Transport Commissioner Interfering in Lisbon Campaign

The intervention of the European Commission into the debate on Lisbon in Ireland has become yet more brazen. The sight of Antonio Tanjani on a whistle-stop tour of the country with Michael O'Leary campaigning for a Yes vote has removed any remaining shred of impartiality. That the European Commission would interfere in the debate in Ireland in this manner is a disgrace. It is a ploy aimed at increasing the pressure on the Irish people to vote Yes.

Read More

Mass civil disobedience to defeat government court threats

It is clear that hundreds of thousands of households will refuse to register or to pay the household tax.  The only issue is whether this number will be more than half a million, more than three-quarters of a million or more than a million itself.  With big numbers deciding it is better to break the law than to break the poor, this is a key first step in a major campaign of civil disobedience.