Debenhams’ dispute: Workers take aim at new government

By Cllr Kieran Mahon

Debenhams’ workers protested outside the National Convention Centre and turned their focus for justice at the incoming Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and Green Party coalition. Despite great adversity, workers have kept Debenhams on the national agenda. 

Under pressure from Debenhams workers in Cork, incoming Taoiseach Micheál Martin has given verbal sympathy to claims for a just settlement. 

The “new” government is sitting on the unimplemented Duffy-Cahill Report, written in response to the looting of Clery’s in 2016 and designed to give workers increased bargaining rights and the ability to recoup the value of assets shifted by the company. This should be implemented immediately and applied to Debenhams before any stock is sold on. The promised stimulus in July for the retail sector should not just be soft money for employers in the sector but used to invest directly in jobs including through public ownership of job shedding outlets like Debenhams. 

Workers have justifiably raised criticisms of the role of their union Mandate. In almost four months, officially sanctioned actions have been at best sporadic with most of the protests being organised unofficially on the initiative of key shop stewards and activists. A clearer message is needed from the union on organising to prevent the disposal of stock including directing managers who are members of Mandate not to be engaging in stock takes. 

As we go to press it is gearing up for a stand off between workers and the liquidator at the stores as KMPG attempt to move stock out. A general call for workers and activists to stand with the Debenhams workers if such a stand off takes place should be made and widely supported.

Debenhams’ workers are leading a campaign that should give example and courage to all workers who will be faced with these questions in the coming period.

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

Trade Unions must fight to defend SEOs

Next Article

Green Party once again wrestles with its conscience... and wins

Related Posts
Read More

SR Technics – Workers should occupy and demand re nationalisation

Statement from Joe Higgins
As venture capitalists seal their plan to smash 1,150 jobs at SR Technics by selling off the Landing Gear and Auxiliary Power Unit, the Irish Government and trade union leadership are in a state of pathetic paralysis. They simply stand by and allow the dictatorship of the market to lay waste to an invaluable industry and source of jobs. SR Technics workers should immediately occupy the plant at Dublin Airport, prevent the sale of machinery and demand renationalisation of what was a publicly owned enterprise until Fianna Fail and the Progressive Democrats privatised it.

ICTU’s 10 Point Plan: Is it fairer or better?

By Kevin McLoughlin

ICTU’s PLAN was to threaten a national strike on 30 March in the hope of forcing new negotiations around their 10 point so-called social solidarity programme There is a better, fairer way.

ICTU’s social solidarity programme relates to jobs, unemployment, pay and the banks. It says those who lose their jobs should be kept at 80% of their earnings for two years, via social welfare, on condition that they go on retraining. It also says bosses should resist lay-offs, and instead consider cutting the working week.

Read More

NI: Step up the pressure after N30

Public sector workers have sent a very loud message to the Northern Ireland Assembly and the Conservative/Liberal Democrat government.

Three million workers belonging to twenty eight unions have walked out in defence of their pensions and the public services which all depend upon.In Northern Ireland it is probable that 80,000 workers have come out in a powerful demonstration of the power of the working class. The strike is a hugely important step forward in the campaign to defend our pensions and services.

Read More

Otis Lifts attempting to smash union

Workers in Otis Lifts, members of the Technical Engineering Electrical Union, are now into the second week of their strike action. The strike was undertaken as a response to the companies’ refusal to accept a Labour Court recommendation with regard to redundancies within the company. Initially the company sought thirteen redundancies and eleven workers were prepared to volunteer.