Dublin Bus routes privatisation – a rotten deal

The National Transport Authority are privatising one-tenth of Dublin Bus. From November 2018 they will outsource the routes to UK company Go-Ahead. The NTA says they are “confident that passengers will benefit from this decision,” but socialists and trade unionists are absolutely certain that workers will suffer from this decision.

By Manus Lenihan

The National Transport Authority are privatising one-tenth of Dublin Bus. From November 2018 they will outsource the routes to UK company Go-Ahead. The NTA says they are “confident that passengers will benefit from this decision,” but socialists and trade unionists are absolutely certain that workers will suffer from this decision.

We are equally certain that this is part of a process of privatisation that would make a mess of Dublin Bus. The only real benefits go to private operators, who get to turn a public service into a license to print money.

“Competition” ploy is a con

Fine Gael claim that the “introduction of competition” is “great news for commuters.” But the false promise of “competition” actually means open season on the rights and pay of the workers. The NTA says it doesn’t “believe” there will be attacks on wages. They think we were born yesterday. Go-Ahead’s counterparts, the private operators who were helped by the government to muscle in on Bus Éireann, have drivers working for them who are on social welfare. It will be for Go-Ahead to decide what to pay and there’s no reason to think it’ll be any different.

Dublin Bus made a cheaper bid for the routes, has exceeded every performance target and put up with massive cuts to the government subvention. But the NTA gave the tender to Go-Ahead instead anyway, claiming that Dublin Bus fell short on “technical” aspects. Any Bus Éireann driver can tell you how private operators rig the game and benefit from preferential treatment, and will smell a rat in this tendering process. So much for competition.

Privatisation must be fought

For socialists, public transport, heavily subsidised by government, is a basic right – not to mention a key means of tackling climate change. Creeping privatisation leads to loss of revenue for the public-owned service, which is in turn used as a justification for more cuts and privatisation. In Britain it has led to a huge rip-off of commuters. In fact, Go-Ahead emerged during and following the massive bus and rail privatisation process of the Thatcher period. It seems to have piggybacked on that disaster. Now it has trouble recruiting drivers to work on low wages, so instead of pay rises, it runs recruitment campaigns in countries where wages are much lower, shamelessly exploiting poor people.

This all has implications for other transport workers too. The strikes of last year and this year in Dublin Bus, Luas and Bus Éireann signal a confrontation over the future of public transport. It’s in the interests of socialists, workers and anyone who is concerned about climate change to stand with these workers in defence of quality public transport and decent pay. Unions must not accept the privatisation agenda.

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

Marx's Capital at 150: an unequalled analysis & critique of capitalism

Next Article

Review: When I Hit You: Or, A Portrait of the Writer As A Young Wife

Related Posts
Read More

No support for the implementation of Croke Park

The passing of the Croke Park Agreement represents an important setback for public sector workers and the working class as a whole. If this deal is implemented unhindered then 20,000 public sector jobs will be lost, working conditions will be decimated and the quality of public services from health to education etc will be driven further into the ground.

Read More

EU: New radical suggestions of ‘austerity contracts’

A new interim report, entitled 'Towards a Genuine Economic and Monetary Union' was circulated by the President of the European Council, Herman Van Rompuy. This will be discussed at this week's European Council meeting. Here, the true vision of a fiscal and political union of the European establishments is made clear. It is a vision long on austerity and extremely short on democracy.

Read More

Nestle clarification

The Socialist Party received the attached letter from Nestlé complaining about the Socialist Party's use of their copyrighted logo (for which we did not seek their permission) on our poster concerning the issue of workers' rights.

The use of the logo and that of other high profile multinationals to replace the stars on the EU flag was designed to convey our view that the EU is run primarily in the interests of the multinational corporations.

However, as can be seen from the Nestlé letter, they fear that the appearance of their logo conveys the notion that the Socialist Party's No to Lisbon campaign is supported by Nestlé!

The Socialist Party is more than happy to clarify publically to anybody who thinks otherwise from viewing the poster that Nestlé do not support the objectives of the Socialist Party.