MEP demands referendum on Fiscal Treaty following poll

Government cannot ignore public’s demand for referendum Political and legal obligation to hold referendum

Government cannot ignore public’s demand for referendum

Political and legal obligation to hold referendum

Commenting on the Red C poll which showed that 73% of people want a referendum to be held on the proposed new treaty, Socialist Party/ ULA MEP Paul Murphy said:

This poll shows that the majority of the Irish public agree with the demand raised by myself and others on the left for a referendum to be held on this Treaty.

The government should stop scrambling desperately for a way to avoid putting this to the people. I believe that there is a legal obligation that this treaty be put to a referendum, but this poll proves that there is now a political obligation for a referendum.

The Socialist Party will be launching our campaign for a referendum in the next week. The content of the Austerity Treaty is so significant that the people must have a right to decide on it. It represents an institutionalisation of austerity through the ‘balanced budget’ rule and a transfer of power from national governments on budgetary questions to the European Commission and Council.

The small margin of support of this Treaty in advance of a vigorous debate about it shows shows that the passing of this treaty cannot be taken for granted by the government. People may and should take their opportunity to reject the austerity that has already been imposed by the EU/IMF and choose not to join the ‘Austerity Club’ that we are being asked to join.

 

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

Septic Tank Charge: Don't register, don't pay!

Next Article

Austerity Treaty is recipe for disaster across Europe

Related Posts
Read More

Is the government prepared to leave austerity behind?

Should a government Minister be allowed to make a far reaching statement that sharply contradicts the thrust of government policy and not be immediately challenged as to the practical implications? If the media afforded acres of coverage to such a statement, should it not then demand that the Minister spell out what concrete action she/he proposed to take if the statement was to mean anything more than empty posturing?