The TEEU applied for a variation of the Registered Employment Agreement in order to implement the increase in the rate of pay for electricians in the building industry that was agreed after the week long strike in mid 2009. Yet again, on 19 February last, the Labour Court adjourned a decision on the matter.
The Electrical Contractors Association, which represents the larger employers, has now withdrawn its support for the increase. An initial report from the commission set up by the Tanaiste, Mary Coughlan, to enquire into the causes of the dispute has was circulated. Its recommendations were extremely unfavourable to workers in electrical contracting. Amongst the possibilities raised is the division of electricians into categories within the industry. This would result in deskilling within the trade and a devaluation of the labour of electricians. It also raised that different rates of pay could be determined by the size of the employing companies. Such a move would accelerate the use of subcontractors, which has already had a disastrous effect on pay and conditions.
The TEEU has rejected the initial report but it is clear that some see the compliance mechanisms mentioned in the report as a positive. This parallels attitudes of other officials in the construction sector, who talk quite openly of the inevitability of acceptance of lower rates and conditions in the industry. They say that an “official compliance agreement” will ensure that these rates and conditions will be easier to enforce. The main carrot for them is that acceptance of these “official conditions” would probably include compulsory trade union membership and “deduction at source”. This would make life very easy for them, regardless of the situation for their members on the ground.
The union movement must use every sinew to fight to maintain wages and conditions. The biggest gain from the electricians strike last year was the defeat of the employers’ proposal for a 10% pay cut. We must fight tooth and nail to defeat every further proposed cut.
Related Posts
Davenport Hotel forced to restore pay
In February, five brave women mounted a picket on the Davenport Hotel on Lower Merrion Street, Dublin. They were doing so in response to the decision made by the O’Callaghan Hotel Group to cut their already low wages from €8.65 to €7.80 per hour. The company decided to implement this wage cut on the back of the outgoing government’s decision to allow a €1 per hour cut in the minimum wage.
Court ruling on REAs poses need for organising drive by union movement
The striking down by the Supreme Court of the REAs will be seen by employers and sub contractors as a signal for a savage attack on the wages and conditions of workers. The trade union movement should immediately declare that any such attacks will be met by all out action and must now go on the offensive to ensure that wages and conditions provided for by the REAs remain intact.
“We’re not leaving, because we’ve been treated with such injustice”
Interview with Worker occupying La Senza, Liffey Valley
ScamBridge.org Launched to Expose JobBridge Exploitation Sceme
Paul Murphy MEP has launched a new website, ScamBridge.org to expose the JobBridge expoloitation scheme.
The JobBridge scheme has been used as a scam for the government to massage the unemployment figures and for many companies to cynically exploit unemployed people. The ScamBridge.org website has been launched to expose this scam and give people an opportunity to share their stories of exploitation. The latest figures suggest that just 400 people who finished their JobBridge internships received jobs with the companies that provided the internships. This is not a scheme that is seriously addressing the crisis of youth unemployment. We are calling for an immediate investigation and review of this scheme, with proper monitoring being introduced.