Why Lisbon is bad for Workers’ Rights

Today at a press conference in the Davenport Hotel prominent Socialist Party spokepeople, accompanied by strike leaders from Coca Cola and MTL Dockworkers, laid out their opposition to the Lisbon Treaty, and explained how the treaty would undermine workers’ rights.

Today at a press conference in the Davenport Hotel prominent Socialist Party spokepeople, accompanied by strike leaders from Coca Cola and MTL Dockworkers, laid out their opposition to the Lisbon Treaty, and explained how the treaty would undermine workers’ rights.

 Councillor Clare Daly pointed out:

“If the government was truly concerned with the rights of workers there was nothing stopping them introducing legislation in the Dáil. Not one specific claim has been made by the government or any of the ‘yes’ side as to how ratifying Lisbon is going to enhance the position of workers.

“The key measure of workers rights is the ability to wage effective industrial action to defend ones pay and conditions. The landmark ECJ judgements as well as recent local High Court decisions to award injunctions to prevent picketing or occupations  by Thomas Cook, MTL Docks, Carrolls Joinery and Coca Cola workers as well as the electricians in recent disputes all clearly demonstrates one thing – that the best way to enhance workers rights is to remove all legal obstacles to the picket. Nothing in Charter would alter the situation faced by these workers”

Councillor Mick Barry remarked:

“A landmark European Court of Justice judgement, the Luxembourg judgment, was delivered just one week after the Irish electorate rejected Lisbon last June.  If the judgment had been made one week before the Irish vote rather than one week after I suspect the Treaty would not merely been have been defeated, it would have been hammered.  If every worker in the country were to understand the implications of Luxembourg and the other ECJ rulings then the Treaty could very well be defeated again on October 2.

“The state of Luxembourg had introduced a series of regulations to benefit migrant workers. These included the requirement that they be given a written contract, that the levels of wages should be linked to the cost of living and a requirement that Luxembourg’s collective agreements were complied with. One by one, the European Court of Justice struck these down, ruling that these labour laws protecting foreign workers were an obstacle to the free provision of cross-border services. This case was taken by the European Commission and clearly demonstrates that for both the Commission and the European Court of Justice, contractors’ profits come way before workers’ rights.”

It’s in The Treaty – Lisbon Copperfastens ‘Right’ of Business To Exploit Workers!

Joe Higgins MEP explained:

“Ratification of the Lisbon Treaty would give the Charter of Fundamental Rights the same legal standing as the EU Treaties. This is said to be a big step forward which will have a major effect on improving workers’ rights. This is absolutely false.

“We show today that, in fact, to ratify Lisbon would copperfasten the ‘right’ of business to exploit migrant workers and enforce wages and conditions away inferior to accepted norms in particular Member States of the European Union.

“This happens because the Lisbon Treaty institutionalises the rulings of the European Court of Justice which endorsed the action of foreign contractors in  importing workers from one Member State to another and seriously breaching the agreed rates of pay and various protections for such workers either agreed in trade union/employer agreements or imposed by local or national authorities.

“Some of the key cases where these judgements were handed down were: Vaxholm/Laval in Sweden 2004, Ruffert in Germany in 2008, and Luxembourg in 2008.

“Should the abuses involved in these cases, and endorsed by the ECJ, become general it would drive down the wages and conditions of all workers in a disastrous ‘race to the bottom.’

“With the passing of Lisbon it would still be as legal for employers, including highly profitable companies, to sack workers and ‘outsource’ their work in order to avail of much cheaper labour for maximisation of profit.  Little wonder that anti trade union employers like Intel and Ryanair have not problem  putting hundreds of thousands of Euro into trying to get The Lisbon Treaty passed.”

 

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

IBEC’s “yes for jobs” campaign a sick joke?

Next Article

Socialist Party Lisbon Leaflet

Related Posts
Read More

US – A graphic picture of decline

New book charts economic, social and political decay of America

 

“No one can say when the unwinding began – when the coil that held Americans together in its secure and  sometimes stifling grip first gave way. Like any great change, the unwinding began at countless times, in  countless ways – and at some moment the country, always the same country, crossed a line of history and  became irretrievably different”.

So begins George Packer in this tremendous book, The Unwinding, which paints a devastating picture of US  capitalism in decline. Similar to Packer, Karl Marx described the collapse of the Spanish Empire as a “slow and  inglorious decay”. The difference is that Spain’s decline took place over centuries, whereas the astonishing  collapse of the US – still, nevertheless, the strongest capitalist power on the planet – has been compressed  into 50 or 60 years!

 

mobile phone mast halted in Bayside!

QUICK ACTION by residents in Bayside Square resulted in Fingal County Council being forced to move to prevent an application for a mobile phone mast by Threefold on the roof of the Squash & Leisure Building as exempted development, as the building contains a creche.

Read More

State also responsible for Pyrite Crisis

A three hour debate in the Dail yesterday once again highlighted the awful legacy left to thousands of homeowners in this State from a blatant failure to implement proper building regulations in the construction of homes during the property bubble era. Yesterday it was the creeping destruction caused by pyrite that was in focus but much reference was made also to those homeowners, such as the residents of Priory Hall on Dublin’s north side, who are living with the agony of being forced out of their homes which are serious fire hazards because the fire safety regulations were not implemented during construction.