Joe Higgins Column: Real Solidarity is United Struggle

IN THE past we typically used the word solidarity to describe working people coming to each other’s assistance against the background of a strike or a community struggle. It was often used also in the context of appeals for funds to assist poverty stricken people hit by terrible natural disasters in the Third World. In the last five months since the onset of the catastrophic financial and general economic crisis we have heard the word solidarity repeated a lot. But in the strangest way and in the most unlikely quarters.

IN THE past we typically used the word solidarity to describe working people coming to each other’s assistance against the background of a strike or a community struggle. It was often used also in the context of appeals for funds to assist poverty stricken people hit by terrible natural disasters in the Third World.

In the last five months since the onset of the catastrophic financial and general economic crisis we have heard the word solidarity repeated a lot. But in the strangest way and in the most unlikely quarters.

Speaking very recently on Pat Kenny’s RTE morning radio programme the leader of IBEC, the organisation of big business, Turlough O’Sullivan, called on working people to show solidarity during this crisis. Taoiseach Brian Cowen, speaking to hundreds of business people at a Dublin Chamber of Commerce dinner, repeated this.

However, in this use of the word solidarity, they are inflicting as serious an assault on the correct meaning of words in the English language as ever former US President George Bush could manage. For solidarity now means the opposite of what it says in the dictionary.

Solidarity in the mouths of big business representatives and their paid political hacks means that the weaker must be forced to come to the assistance of the stronger, the poorer to the richer and the victims to the perpetrators of the crime.

Solidarity means that nurses, Council road sweepers and canteen staff in public hospitals must endure savage cuts in their wages, under the guise of a pension levy, to pay for an economic crash caused by the profiteering and reckless financial gambling by millionaire and billionaire speculators, developers and bankers.

What is remarkable is the shamelessness of the representatives of big business and right wing politicians in standing before the country and demanding that millions of ordinary working people pay for the crisis which their activities have inflicted on the economy. They do this without even an attempt at an apology for the wreckage they have caused in society.

Even more remarkable is how slavishly journalists repeat the propaganda of the establishment and become virtual spokespeople for them. And not just in the billionaire owned media.

RTE’s Morning Ireland, which is the most listened to radio programme in the state, is particularly persistent in reflecting the propaganda and excuses of the establishment and government. A few days ago one of the main presenters, Aine Lawler, vehemently denounced ESB workers who had been given a modest pay increase of 3% agreed last year. “Where was their sense of solidarity with private sector workers who are losing their jobs?” she indignantly demanded.

The following day it was an entirely different tone as the same presenter played us six minutes of a speech made the night before by Taoiseach Cowen to the Dublin Chamber of Commerce. Critical faculties evaporated as she gushed over the tape.

Cowen appealed for solidarity to enable the country to come out of the disaster in which it finds itself. He was speaking to an assembly which included some of those whose gross speculation and profiteering in the property and banking sectors triggered the crash that has devastated the public finances.

Brian Cowen was a senior leader in the governments which connived with those speculators, endorsed their profiteering and legislated for their greed. He is as guilty as them for the catastrophe. Surely any journalist worthy of the title would, in these circumstances, be asking why this kind of sheer cynicism and hypocrisy should be greeted with anything other than fury and indignation by the big majority of working people who are now expected to pay the price for the activities of Fianna Fail and their speculator friends?

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

NI: Youth unemployment at 15%.. FIGHT FOR JOBS.

Next Article

Sri Lanka: Stop the slaughter!

Related Posts
Read More

A socialist voice joins Seattle City Council

Who would have imagined that in a major American city, at a post election inauguration ceremony attended by 1,000 people, a new, directly elected Mayor and other members of the City Council would be completely eclipsed by the response of the attendance to a Socialist Councillor? That was the situation in Seattle on 6 January. Socialist Alternative Councillor Kshama Sawant, in her speech, roundly denounced the problems which ‘crisis ridden capitalism’ causes for working class people, called for workers to organise, for a new party of the working class as an alternative to the Republican and Democratic Party politicians and for socialist change.
Read More

Real debate needed over presidential election

Even before they start their Third Level or working lives, the 55,000 students who received their Leaving Cert results last Wednesday have done the people of the State a service. Acres of coverage of their achievements meant that, yesterday, most of the main national newspapers, including The Mail, were Presidential campaign free zones. What a relief.

Read More

The Markets rule in Europe

As recently as a year ago when I and others on the Left wrote and spoke about ‘the dictatorship of the financial markets’ many people thought we were exaggerating. However after the events of the past few weeks, can there be any doubt but that we are witnessing a full frontal assault on democratic rights by European bondholders, bankers and speculators facilitated by the leadership of the European Union?

Read More

Fine Gael’s “New Republic” is a privatised Republic

There is no hint of modesty in Fine Gael’s claims for its future economic and political plans. This is the ‘most ambitious programme for political reform since the 1930s’ according to their leading spokespeople as they proclaim their vision of a ‘New Republic.’ Alas Fine Gael’s ‘new’ Republic would look very similar to the old one which that party had a big hand in fashioning.