Apple’s corporation tax scams: Who is lying Apple CEO or the Taoiseach?

Socialist Party MEP, Paul Murphy, responded to further revelations about the level of corporation tax paid by Apple Sales International and said that this again raises questions which the Taoiseach must answer:

Once again, it has been revealed that Ireland is a tax haven for multinational corporations. The use of creative accounting, and scams like the ‘Double Irish’ have seen Apple Sales International pay a pittance in corporation tax for at least a decade. While they laugh all the way to the bank, it is the Irish public who lose out.

The difference between what they paid and what they should have paid is €850 million. What could this have paid for? What austerity taxes could have been avoided if these companies paid their tax? What public services would not have been cut? It could have plugged the gap in health care spending instead we have a crisis of people on trolleys in A+E departments.  It could have paid for more teachers; instead we have increasing class sizes. It more than covers the property tax which people struggled to pay, and got loans to pay last year and this.

This reignites questions, which Taoiseach Kenny sidestepped last year, about the tax arrangements which have been reached with Apple. At the time, Apple CEO Tim Cook said that they received a ‘tax incentive’ while Kenny said that there were no ‘special deals’. Someone is obviously lying! It’s time for the Taoiseach to come clean and publish these deals. There were also questions about the role played by Apple in the 1980s in the creation of the ‘Double Irish’ these must be made public now.

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

Ukraine: Russian troops take up positions throughout Crimea

Next Article

Why Paul Murphy MEP is fighting the Water Tax

Related Posts
Read More

Greyhound lockout – a fight for all workers

It is now nine weeks since Greyhound workers were treated in the style of William Martin Murphy by their employer, Michael Buckley. They arrived to work – were presented with new contracts, including pay cut of up to 35% and a change to a whole series of other working conditions and were instructed to sign or they were not working. After refusing to sign, they were escorted off the premises by security. Agency workers immediately began doing their jobs. This is 1913 in 2014.