Taoiseach must clarify – could government have blocked ‘blackmail clause’ and why didn’t it?

Government spokesperson admits connivance in insertion of ‘blackmail clause’ into ESM Treaty Government’s big stick for referendum ‘seriously undermined’

Government spokesperson admits connivance in insertion of ‘blackmail clause’ into ESM Treaty

Government’s big stick for referendum ‘seriously undermined’

The statement by a government spokesperson that there was ‘a very strong and logical consensus’ that access to to ESM funds ‘was contingent on a commitment to fiscal responsibility’ seems to amount to an admission by the government that it connived in the change of the ESM Treaty from July last year to the version signed on 2 February of this year. A key change was the insertion of the clause that states that countries that do not sign up for the Fiscal Treaty will not be able to access ESM funding. This would mean that the government connived with the EU political establishment in the fashioning of the biggest stick that is being used to try to force people to vote yes in the upcoming Treaty.

The Taoiseach must immediately clarify the position. Is it the case, as I believe, that this change must have been agreed unanimously and therefore the Irish government could have blocked the insertion of the ‘blackmail clause’ into the second ESM Treaty which was signed on 2 February? Why did it not do so? Did it in fact welcome the insertion of this clause as an insurance policy in case it was forced to hold a referendum in order that they could use it as a weapon to strike fear into people with? The government can claim all it wants that this was not a secret agreeement, but can it point to a public debate on this matter?

If it is the case that the government agreed to the insertion of this clause into the ESM Treaty, surely its use as the main argument to persuade people to vote yes is fairly seriously undermined.

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

International Women's Day 2012 - Remembering the struggles & victories of women workers

Next Article

Household Tax campaign and the building of a new working class party

Related Posts
Read More

NAMA, billions for the rich – Zero for disabled, sick and struggling homeowners!

The contrast between how the government treats the wealthy developers and bankers who are in trouble and ordinary people never fails to shock. While thousands were forced out onto the streets to protest against cuts in the health budget which have resulted in the closure of essential respite services for the families of those with intellectual or physical disabilities, the government continues its kid glove treatment of those who helped cause the economic crisis.

Read More

Build the ULA, build the fight back!

It’s just two months into this new Dail and the character of the new government is clear. Its the same as the old one, kneels before the ditaks of the EU/IMF, with the Labour Party in particular, arrogantly lecturing working class people to accept austerity cuts. As someone on the radio said, "Same circus, just different clowns!"