Joe Higgins MEP welcomes European Parliament’s rejection of SWIFT agreement

I welcome the defeat of the SWIFT agreement in the European Parliament. This proposal is a crude attempt to use the threat of terrorism to increase surveillance of people across Europe. It represents an attack on civil liberties, giving US agencies access to billions of financial transactions and personal information.

I welcome the defeat of the SWIFT agreement in the European Parliament. This proposal is a crude attempt to use the threat of terrorism to increase surveillance of people across Europe. It represents an attack on civil liberties, giving US agencies access to billions of financial transactions and personal information.

 

Those that implied we should trust the US government on this should remember that the US secret services secretly accessed these records after September 11 without even letting the EU know. For exposing this, the New York Times was then denounced by the US government, implying that they were assisting terrorists.

It is vital that personal information and civil liberties are protected from intrusions by secret agencies based in Europe or America. According to the confidential reports by Judge Bruguiere, moreover, there has been no evidence presented that even one case of terrorism has been prevented or prosecuted based on the financial data alone. Instead, it is simply another use of the threat of terrorism as a pretext to undermine civil liberties.

 

Read the full report on this issue at joehiggins.eu

Total
0
Shares
Previous Article

Halifax Axe 750 Jobs – Fightback Needed

Next Article

Joe Higgins call for Halifax to be taken into Public Ownership

Related Posts
Read More

The 1793 Dingle riots

Since the centenary of the Great Dublin Lockout has been preoccupying us in 2013, it would be remiss not to mark also the 220th anniversary of a dramatic movement of resistance to tyranny that took place in West Kerry.

Read More

Joe Higgins Column: Real Solidarity is United Struggle

IN THE past we typically used the word solidarity to describe working people coming to each other’s assistance against the background of a strike or a community struggle. It was often used also in the context of appeals for funds to assist poverty stricken people hit by terrible natural disasters in the Third World.

In the last five months since the onset of the catastrophic financial and general economic crisis we have heard the word solidarity repeated a lot. But in the strangest way and in the most unlikely quarters.